How AfD seized power in Germany's east—and what enabled it
How AfD seized power in Germany's east—and what enabled it

In the eastern German state of Saxony-Anhalt, voters delivered a historic rebuke to the country's political establishment on Sunday, propelling the Alternative for Germany—the AfD—to its strongest regional showing yet. With projections placing the anti-migration party at just over 44% of the vote, more than double its 2019 result, the outcome marks a watershed moment for a nation that has long maintained a "firewall" against far-right governance since 1945.

But behind the headline numbers lies a more complex story about institutional failure, voter abandonment and the erosion of consensus that has defined German politics for decades.

The most immediate factor is Friedrich Merz, chancellor of Germany's center-right Christian Democratic Union. His party's regional branch in Saxony-Anhalt, which has governed the state for 24 years, was projected to plummet to just 18% of the vote—losing roughly half its support. AfD's top candidate, Ulrich Siegmund, capitalized on the frustration. "A very good campaigner for us in this election campaign was Friedrich Merz," Siegmund said after polls closed.

Germany's sluggish economy is a concrete factor in the shift. The national government has failed to convince voters it has a viable recovery plan. In Saxony-Anhalt, which sits in the formerly communist east and has long struggled economically, that failure carries particular weight.

What's notable is what didn't happen: mainstream parties have not articulated a compelling counternarrative. Instead, they've largely relied on a categorical refusal to work with AfD—the so-called firewall. Franziska Hoppermann, the CDU's national general secretary, was characteristically blunt in the wake of Sunday's results. "AfD is a right-wing extremist party," she said, citing the party's eurozone exit proposal, its ties to Russia, and its fundamentally different vision of social policy. "We will not work with them."

Germany's domestic intelligence agency has classified AfD's Saxony-Anhalt branch as a confirmed right-wing extremist group, pointing to members' rhetoric disparaging migrants from Muslim countries. The party's explicit platform on "remigration"—effectively mass deportation—is central to its appeal.

Yet a firewall only works if the other side of it appears functional. When voters perceive that mainstream parties cannot or will not solve their problems, the firewall becomes merely another symbol of an unresponsive establishment. In Saxony-Anhalt, the arithmetic tells the story. The Left Party, center-left Social Democrats and Greens were each projected to land around 9% of the vote. The BSW, a newer populist party, faced uncertainty about clearing the 5% threshold needed for representation.

This creates a governance crisis that extends beyond one state election. Germany has not had a far-right or far-right populist party leading a national, state or major city government in the modern era. AfD's regional branch was explicitly seeking an absolute majority in Saxony-Anhalt to govern alone and overcome mainstream parties' refusal to cooperate with it. While projections suggest the party fell slightly short of that threshold, the sheer magnitude of support represents a qualitative break from the postwar consensus.

Merz's government has yet to produce a coherent economic message, let alone a vision that speaks to the specific concerns of eastern states like Saxony-Anhalt. That vacuum didn't create AfD, but it has allowed the party to position itself as the only force willing to name public anxieties about migration, economic stagnation and cultural change—regardless of the solutions it proposes.

Sunday's result should be read as a warning about what happens when democratic institutions lose public confidence. Whether the firewall holds—whether mainstream parties ultimately refuse to govern with AfD even if that means deadlock—remains to be seen. But the vote count suggests that maintaining that firewall through institutional willpower alone, without addressing the material grievances driving voters toward the far right, may not be sustainable much longer.

Jordan has spent a decade chasing paper trails at city hall and corporate boardrooms. Specializes in public records, whistleblower sourcing, and long-form accountability pieces. Beats: Corruption, Public Records, Criminal Justice, Corporate Accountability. AI-generated.